A.The Evolution of Article 2-1-2:III.REPRESENTATIVE CASES
B.Appellation Fame
C.Same or Similar Appellations
A.Negurosu Denko KK v. Matsushita Denko KK 77IV.WHY SO FEW CASES?
B.Tokyo Kyuko Dentetsu KK v. Takachi Noboru84
C.Gibson Guitar Corporation v. Fernandes, K.K.89
D.Kobayashi v. Uesugi93
E.K.K. JACCS v. Nihonkai Pakuto109
F.Levi Strauss v. Edwin Mfg.110
G.K.K. Daigyotsusho v. J-Phone Higashi Nihon K.K. 112
H.Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. v. Puropasuto122
A.More Cases Than Meet The EyeV.CONCLUSION
B.Statute is Vague
C.Defensive Mark Registration System is Not Used Either
D.Dilution is Superfluous in Japan